Clinical spine care partnerships between high-income countries and low-and-middle-income countries: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Clinical collaboration between spine professionals in high-income countries (HICs) and low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) may provide improvements in the accessibility, efficacy, and safety of global spine care. Currently, the scope and effectiveness of these collaborations remain unclear. In this review, we describe the literature on the current state of these partnerships to provide a framework for exploring future best practices. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were queried for articles on spine-based clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs published between 2000 and March 10, 2023. This search yielded 1528 total publications. After systematic screening, nineteen articles were included in the final review. RESULTS: All published partnerships involved direct clinical care and 13/19 included clinical training of local providers. Most of the published collaborations reviewed involved one of four major global outreach organizations with the majority of sites in Africa. Participants were primarily physicians and physicians-in-training. Only 5/19 studies reported needs assessments prior to starting their partnerships. Articles were split on evaluative focus, with some only evaluating clinical outcomes and some evaluating the nature of the partnership itself. CONCLUSIONS: Published studies on spine-focused clinical partnerships between HICs and LMICs remain scarce. Those that are published often do not report needs assessments and formal metrics to evaluate the efficacy of such partnerships. Toward improving the quality of spine care globally, we recommend an increase in the quality and quantity of published studies involving clinical collaborations between HICs and LICs, with careful attention to reporting early needs assessments and evaluation strategies.

National Patterns in Utilization of Knee and Hip Arthroscopy: An Analysis of Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Disparities in the United States.

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities in the field of orthopaedic surgery have been reported extensively across many subspecialties. However, these data remain relatively sparse in orthopaedic sports medicine, especially with respect to commonly performed procedures including knee and hip arthroscopy. Purpose: To assess (1) differences in utilization of knee and hip arthroscopy between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients in the United States (US) and (2) how these differences vary by geographical region. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: The study sample was acquired from the 2019 National Ambulatory Surgery Sample database. Racial and ethnic differences in age-standardized utilization rates of hip and knee arthroscopy were calculated using survey weights and population estimates from US census data. Poisson regression was used to model age-standardized utilization rates for hip and knee arthroscopy while controlling for several demographic and clinical variables. Results: During the study period, rates of knee arthroscopy utilization among White patients were significantly higher than those of Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients (ie, per 100,000, White: 180.5, Black: 113.2, Hispanic: 122.2, and Asian: 58.6). Disparities were even more pronounced among patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, with White patients receiving the procedure at almost 4 to 5 times higher rates (ie, per 100,000, White: 12.6, Black: 3.2, Hispanic: 2.3, Asian or Pacific Islander: 1.8). Disparities in knee and hip arthroscopy utilization between White and non-White patients varied significantly by region, with gaps in knee arthroscopy being most pronounced in the Midwest (adjusted rate ratio, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.9-2.1]) and those in hip arthroscopy being greatest in the West (adjusted rate ratio, 5.3 [95% CI, 4.9-5.6]). Conclusion: Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of knee and hip arthroscopy were found across the US, with decreased rates among Black, Hispanic, and Asian or Pacific Islander patients compared with White patients. Disparities were most pronounced in the Midwest and South and greater for hip than knee arthroscopy, possibly demonstrating emerging inequality in a rapidly growing and evolving procedure across the country.

Improving Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Driven by Increasing Utilization of Ambulatory Surgical Centers in New York State.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess trends in disparities in utilization of hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs) and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) for outpatient ACDF (OP-ACDF) between White, Black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients from 2015 to 2018 in New York State. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Racial and ethnic disparities within the field of spine surgery have been thoroughly documented. To date, it remains unknown how these disparities have evolved in the outpatient setting alongside the rapid emergence of ASCs and whether restrictive patterns of access to these outpatient centers exist by race and ethnicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review from 2015 to 2018 using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) New York State Ambulatory Database. Differences in utilization rates for OP-ACDF were assessed and trended over time by race and ethnicity for both HOPDs and freestanding ASCs. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between utilization rates for OP-ACDF and race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2018, Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients were less likely to undergo OP-ACDF compared with White patients in New York State. However, the magnitude of these disparities lessened over time, as Black, Hispanic, and Asian patients had greater relative increases in utilization of HOPDs and ASCs for ACDF when compared with White patients ( Ptrend <0.001). The magnitude of the increase in freestanding ASC utilization was such that minority patients had higher ACDF utilization rates in freestanding ASCs by 2018 ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of improving racial disparities in the relative utilization of outpatient ACDF in New York State. The increase in access to outpatient ACDF appeared to be driven by an increasing number of patients undergoing ACDF in freestanding ASCs in large metropolitan areas. These improving disparities are encouraging and contrast previously documented inequalities in inpatient spine surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trends in Outpatient Cervical Spine Surgery: Are There Emerging Disparities?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to (1) assess disparities in relative utilization of outpatient cervical spine surgery between White and Black patients from 2010 to 2019 and (2) to measure how these racial differences have evolved over time. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although outpatient spine surgery has become increasingly popularized over the last decade, it remains unknown how racial disparities in surgical utilization have translated to the outpatient setting and whether restrictive patterns of access to outpatient cervical spine procedures may exist. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from 2010 to 2019 was conducted using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Relative utilization of outpatient (same-day discharge) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (OP-ACDF) and cervical disk replacement (OP-CDR) were assessed and trended over time between races. Multivariable regressions were subsequently utilized to adjust for baseline patient factors and comorbidities. RESULTS: Overall, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo OP-ACDF or OP-CDR surgery when compared with White patients ( P <0.03 for both OP-ACDF and OP-CDR). From 2010 to 2019, a persisting disparity over time was found in outpatient utilization for both ACDF and CDR ( e.g. White vs. Black OP-ACDF: 6.0% vs. 3.1% in 2010 compared with 16.7% vs. 8.5% in 2019). These results held in all adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting racial disparities in outpatient spine surgery and demonstrates an emerging disparity in outpatient cervical spine utilization among Black patients. These restrictive patterns of access to same-day outpatient hospital and surgery centers may contribute to broader disparities in the overall utilization of major spine procedures that have been previously reported. Renewed interventions are needed to both understand and address these emerging inequalities in outpatient care before they become more firmly established within our orthopedic and neurosurgery spine delivery systems.

Trends in Geographic Disparities in Access to Ambulatory Surgery Centers in New York, 2010 to 2018.

This cross-sectional analysis evaluates trends in the density, volume, and utilization of ambulatory surgery centers by neighborhood socioeconomic status.

Increase in surgeons performing outpatient anterior cervical spine surgery leads to a shift in case volumes over time.

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated an increase in the performance of outpatient anterior cervical surgery. The degree to which this increase is due to volume increase per individual surgeon versus increase in individual surgeons performing outpatient cervical surgery is unknown. Methods: Patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or cervical disk arthroplasty (CDA) between 2010 and 2018 in NY state were identified. As a comparison we also evaluated trends for inpatient ACDF and CDA. Annual outpatient case volumes were calculated and defined as being high (> 20/year), intermediate (>5 and ≤ 20/year) or low (>1 and ≤ 5/year). Descriptive statistics were used to report temporal trends and Poisson regression was used to test for statistical significance. We also analyzed trends in various operative metrics by surgeon volume. Results: In 2010, there were 96 surgeons who performed outpatient ACDF or CDA on a total of 1,855 patients. In 2018, this increased to 253 surgeons performing outpatient ACDF or CDA on a total of 3,372 patients. In comparison, there were 350 surgeons performing 6,783 inpatient cases in 2010 and 376 surgeons performing 6,796 inpatient cases in 2018. The average annual outpatient case volume decreased from 18.8 (95% CI, 13.5 - 24.1) to 12.2 (95% CI, 10.0 - 14.3) surgeries per surgeon. The percentage of surgeons with a high case volume also decreased from 30.2% in 2010 to 10.7% in 2018, whereas the percentage with a low case volume increased (32.3% to 49.8%). Differences between high and low volume surgeons in operative time, length of stay and total charges widened over time. Conclusion: The increase in outpatient anterior cervical surgery appears to be primarily driven by a greater number of surgeons performing ACDF and CDA on an outpatient basis, as opposed to increased case volumes for each surgeon. In contrast, trends for inpatient anterior cervical surgery were stable.

Evaluation of the safety of tranexamic acid use in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric spinal fusion may be associated with significant intraoperative blood loss, leading to complications from transfusion, hypoperfusion and coagulopathy. One emerging strategy to mediate these risks is by utilization of the anti-fibrinolytic agent tranexamic acid (TXA). However, concerns regarding potential adverse reactions, specifically postoperative seizures and thrombotic events, still exist. To assess these risks, we examined the perioperative morbidity of TXA use in a large national database. METHODS: Retrospective data from pediatric patients (age 18 years or younger), discharged between January 2013 to December 2015, who underwent primary or revision posterior spinal fusions, was collected from the Premier Perspective database (Premier, Charlotte, NC). Patients were stratified by TXA use and records were assessed for complications of new onset seizures, strokes, pulmonary embolisms (PE) or deep vein thromboses (DVT) occurring during the perioperative period. RESULTS: In this cohort of 2,633 pediatric patients undergoing posterior spinal fusions, most often to treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, 15% received TXA. Overall, adverse events were rare in this patient population. The incidence of seizure, stoke, PE, or DVT in the control group was 0.54% (95% CI, 0.31% to 0.94%) and not significantly different from the TXA group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of DVTs, and no incidences of stroke in either group. There were no new-onset seizures or PEs in patients who received TXA. CONCLUSIONS: The use of TXA was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events including seizure, stroke, PE, and DVT. Our findings support the safety of TXA use in pediatric patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

Access to Mechanical Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke in the United States.

Background and Purpose: Mechanical thrombectomy helps prevent disability in patients with acute ischemic stroke involving occlusion of a large cerebral vessel. Thrombectomy requires procedural expertise and not all hospitals have the staff to perform this intervention. Few population-wide data exist regarding access to mechanical thrombectomy. Methods: We examined access to thrombectomy for ischemic stroke using discharge data from calendar years 2016 to 2018 from all nonfederal emergency departments and acute care hospitals across 11 US states encompassing 80 million residents. Facilities were classified as hubs if they performed mechanical thrombectomy, gateways if they transferred patients who ultimately underwent mechanical thrombectomy, and gaps otherwise. We used standard descriptive statistics and unadjusted logistic regression models in our primary analyses. Results: Among 205 681 patients with ischemic stroke, 100 139 (48.7% [95% CI, 48.5%­48.9%]) initially received care at a thrombectomy hub, 72 534 (35.3% [95% CI, 35.1%­35.5%]) at a thrombectomy gateway, and 33 008 (16.0% [95% CI, 15.9%­16.2%]) at a thrombectomy gap. Patients who initially received care at thrombectomy gateways were substantially less likely to ultimately undergo thrombectomy than patients who initially received care at thrombectomy hubs (odds ratio, 0.27 [95% CI, 0.25­0.28]). Rural patients had particularly limited access: 27.7% (95% CI, 26.9%­28.6%) of such patients initially received care at hubs versus 69.5% (95% CI, 69.1%­69.9%) of urban patients. For 93.8% (95% CI, 93.6%­94.0%) of patients with stroke at gateways, their initial facility was capable of delivering intravenous thrombolysis, compared with 76.3% (95% CI, 75.8%­76.7%) of patients at gaps. Our findings were unchanged in models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities and persisted across multiple sensitivity analyses, including analyses adjusting for estimated stroke severity. Conclusions: We found that a substantial proportion of patients with ischemic stroke across the United States lacked access to thrombectomy even after accounting for interhospital transfers. US systems of stroke care require further development to optimize thrombectomy access.

Prevalence of Cervical Artery Dissection Among Hospitalized Patients With Stroke by Age in a Nationally Representative Sample From the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the prevalence of cervical artery dissection remains constant across age groups, we evaluated the relationship between age and cervical artery dissection in patients with stroke using a nationally representative sample from the United States. METHODS: We used inpatient claims data included in the 2012-2015 releases of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS). We used validated ICD-9-CM codes to identify adults hospitalized with ischemic stroke and a concomitant diagnosis of carotid or vertebral artery dissection. Survey weights provided by the NIS and population estimates from the US census were used to calculate nationally representative estimates. The χ2 test for trend was used to compare the prevalence of concomitant dissection among stroke hospitalizations across patient subgroups defined by age. Poisson regression and the Wald test for trend were used to evaluate whether the prevalence of hospitalizations for stroke and concomitant dissection per million person-years varied by age groups. RESULTS: There were 17,320 (95% confidence interval [CI], 15,614-19,026) hospitalizations involving ischemic stroke and a concomitant dissection. The prevalence of dissection among stroke hospitalizations decreased across 10-year age groups from 7.2% (95% CI, 6.2%-8.1%) among persons younger than 30 years to 0.2% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.2%) among persons older than 80 years (p value for trend <0.001). However, the prevalence of hospitalizations for stroke and concomitant dissection increased from 5.4 (95% CI, 4.6-6.2) hospitalizations per million person-years among adults younger than 30 to 24.4 (95% CI, 21.0-27.9) hospitalizations per million person-years among adults older than age 80 (p value for trend <0.01). CONCLUSION: In a nationally representative sample, the prevalence of hospitalizations for dissection-related stroke increased with age.

Prior antiplatelet therapy and haematoma expansion after primary intracerebral haemorrhage: an individual patient-level analysis of CLEAR III, MISTIE III and VISTA-ICH.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between prior antiplatelet therapy (APT) and outcomes after primary intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), and assess if it varies by haematoma location. METHODS: We pooled individual patient data from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive-ICH trials dataset, Clot Lysis: Evaluating Accelerated Resolution of Intraventricular Hemorrhage III trial and the Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Alteplase for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Phase III trial. The exposure was APT preceding ICH diagnosis. The primary outcome was haematoma expansion at 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were admission haematoma volume, all-cause mortality, death or major disability (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥4) and shift in mRS distribution. Mixed-effects models were used to assess the relationship between APT and outcomes. Secondary analyses were stratified by ICH location and study cohort. RESULTS: Among 1420 patients with ICH, there were 782 (55.1%) lobar and 596 (42.0%) deep haemorrhages. APT was reported in 284 (20.0%) patients. In adjusted regression models, prior APT was not associated with haematoma expansion (OR, 0.97; 95% CI 0.60 to 1.57), major disability or death (OR, 1.05; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.63), all-cause mortality (OR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.85), admission haematoma volume (beta, -0.17; SE, 0.09; p=0.07) and shift in mRS (p=0.43). In secondary analyses, APT was associated with admission haematoma volume in lobar ICH (beta, 0.25; SE, 0.12; p=0.03), but there was no relationship with other ICH outcomes when stratified by haematoma location or study cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In a large heterogeneous cohort of patients with ICH, prior APT was not associated with haematoma expansion or functional outcomes after ICH, regardless of haematoma location. APT was associated with admission haematoma volumes in lobar ICH.

Vascular Neurologists' Involvement in the Care of Medicare Patients With Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to determine the proportion of patients with ischemic stroke evaluated by vascular neurologists in the United States. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2015 claims from a 5% nationally representative sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified patients ≥65 years of age who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke. We ascertained the proportion of patients evaluated during the hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge by nonvascular and vascular neurologists. We assessed the relationship between county-level socioeconomic status and the likelihood of neurologist evaluation and between neurologist evaluation and diagnostic testing. RESULTS: Among 66 989 patients with ischemic stroke, 37 820 (56.5%) were evaluated by a nonvascular neurologist and 11 700 (17.5%) by a board-certified vascular neurologist. Across increasing quartiles of county socioeconomic advantage, the proportion of patients evaluated by a vascular neurologist was 12.2%, 16.5%, 19.8%, and 23.0%. Relative to evaluation by a nonvascular neurologist, evaluation by a vascular neurologist was associated with a higher likelihood of postdischarge heart rhythm monitoring (odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-1.9), echocardiography (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.4), cervical vessel imaging (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2-1.3), and intracranial vessel imaging (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 2.0-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative cohort of Medicare beneficiaries, we found that about three quarters of patients with ischemic stroke were evaluated by a neurologist, and about one-sixth were evaluated by a vascular neurologist. Patients who were evaluated by a vascular neurologist were significantly more likely to undergo diagnostic testing.

Trends in Active Cigarette Smoking Among Stroke Survivors in the United States, 1999 to 2018.

Background and Purpose- Patients who continue to smoke after a stroke face a higher risk of recurrent stroke. While several effective drugs for smoking cessation became available over the past 2 decades, whether active smoking has decreased among stroke survivors is unknown. We, therefore, evaluated trends in active smoking among stroke survivors during this period. Methods- We performed trends analyses using cross-sectional data collected every 1 to 2 years from 2 US health surveys spanning 1999 to 2018. In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) survey, participants were asked about prior stroke and active tobacco smoking. In NHANES, serum cotinine levels were available as a secondary measure of active smoking. We used multivariable logistic regression models for survey data to assess trends in active smoking among participants with and without prior stroke. Results- Among 49 375 participants in NHANES during 1999 to 2016 and 3 621 741 participants in BRFSS during 2011 to 2018, the prevalence of stroke was ≈3%. The overall prevalence of active smoking among stroke survivors was 24% in NHANES and 23% in BRFSS. Among individuals without prior stroke, the odds of smoking decreased over time in both NHANES (odds ratio, 0.95 per 2 years [95% CI, 0.93-0.96]) and BRFSS (odds ratio, 0.96 per year [95% CI, 0.96-0.96]). In contrast, there was no decrease in smoking among stroke survivors in NHANES (odds ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.93-1.07]) or BRFSS (odds ratio, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.98-1.004]). Results were consistent in secondary analysis using biochemical ascertainment of active smoking in NHANES and in sensitivity analyses accounting for potential demographic changes in stroke epidemiology. Conclusions- In contrast to the general population, the prevalence of active smoking among stroke survivors has not decreased during the past 2 decades.

Rates and Trends of Endotracheal Intubation in Patients With Status Epilepticus.

OBJECTIVE: Among patients with status epilepticus, we sought to determine the rate of endotracheal intubation, identify the physician specialties responsible for endotracheal intubation, and characterize the trend in use of endotracheal intubation over the last 20 years. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study using data from 2 sources. First, we used inpatient claims between 2009 and 2015 from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Patients with status epilepticus were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and those who underwent endotracheal intubation were identified based on Current Procedural Terminology codes. Medical specialties of providers performing intubation were identified based on Healthcare Provider Taxonomy Codes. Second, we used claims data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to estimate the annual rates and trends of endotracheal intubation and tracheostomy among patients with status epilepticus from 1995 to 2014. RESULTS: Among 1971 Medicare beneficiaries with status epilepticus, 566 (29%) patients underwent endotracheal intubation. 375 (66%) patients were intubated on admission. The most common medical providers performing intubation in patients with status epilepticus were emergency medicine physicians (50.4%), anesthesiologists (16.4%), and pulmonary medicine physicians (10.1%). Neurologists accounted for 1.7% of all intubations. Among individuals with status epilepticus identified in the NIS, 248 681 (41.7%) were intubated. The proportion of patients intubated increased from 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.8%-31.3%, P = .018) in 1995 to 50.8% (95% CI: 49.6%-52%, P = .012) in 2014. The proportion of patients with status epilepticus who underwent tracheostomy increased from 2.2% (95% CI: 1.7%-2.7%, P = .005) in 1995 to 3.4% (95% CI: 3%-3.9%, P = .004) in 2014. SIGNIFICANCE: Approximately 1 in 3 patients with status epilepticus undergo endotracheal intubation. Over the last 20 years, the proportion of patients with status epilepticus undergoing endotracheal intubation has almost doubled. Neurologists perform a small percentage of these intubations.

Effect of A Randomized trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation on Interventional Treatment Rates for Unruptured Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, investigators from A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (AVM; ARUBA) reported that interventions to obliterate unruptured AVMs caused more morbidity and mortality than medical management. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether interventions for unruptured AVM decreased after publication of ARUBA results. METHODS: We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database to assess trends in interventional AVM management in patients ≥18 years of age from 2010 through 2015. Unruptured brain AVMs were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code 747.81 and excluding any patient with a diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage. Our primary outcome was interventional AVM treatment, identified using ICD-9-CM procedure codes for surgical resection, endovascular therapy, and stereotactic radiosurgery. Join-point regression was used to assess trends in the incidence of interventional AVM management among adults from 2010 through 2015. RESULTS: There was no significant U.S. population level change in unruptured brain AVM intervention rates before versus after ARUBA (p = 0.59), with the incidence of AVM intervention ranging from 8.0 to 9.2 per 10 million U.S. residents before the trial publication to 7.7-8.3 per 10 million afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample, we found no change in rates of interventional unruptured AVM management after publication of the ARUBA trial results.

Temporal Trends in the Use of Acute Recanalization Therapies for Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the US nationwide temporal trends in recanalization therapy utilization for ischemic stroke among patients with and without cancer. METHODS: We identified all acute ischemic stroke (AIS) hospitalizations in the National Inpatient Sample from January 1, 1998 to September 30, 2015. The primary exposure was solid or hematologic cancer. The primary outcome was use of intravenous thrombolysis. The secondary outcome was use of endovascular therapy (EVT). RESULTS: Among 9,508,804 AIS hospitalizations, 503,510 (5.3%) involved cancer patients. Intravenous thrombolysis use among ischemic stroke patients with cancer increased from .01% (95% confidence interval [CI], .00%-.02%) in 1998 to 4.91% (95% CI, 4.33%-5.48%) in 2015, whereas intravenous thrombolysis use among ischemic stroke patients without cancer increased from .02% (95% CI, .01%-.02%) in 1998 to 7.22% (95% CI, 6.98%-7.45%) in 2015. The demographic- and comorbidity-adjusted odds ratio/year of receiving intravenous thrombolysis was similar in patients with cancer (1.21; 95% CI, 1.20-1.23) versus those without (1.20; 95% CI, 1.19-1.21). EVT use among ischemic stroke patients with cancer increased from .05% (95% CI, .02%-.07%) in 2006 to 1.90% (95% CI, 1.49%-2.31%) in 2015, whereas EVT use among ischemic stroke patients without cancer increased from .09% (95% CI, .00%-.18%) in 2006 to 1.88% (95% CI, 1.68%-2.09%) in 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Among 9.5 million AIS hospitalizations, patients with cancer received intravenous thrombolysis about two thirds as often as patients without cancer. This difference persisted over time despite increased utilization in both groups. EVT utilization was similar between cancer and non-cancer AIS patients.

National Trends in Hospitalizations for Stroke Associated With Infective Endocarditis and Opioid Use Between 1993 and 2015.

Background and Purpose- There has been a recent sharp rise in opioid-related deaths in the United States. Intravenous opioid use can lead to infective endocarditis (IE) which can result in stroke. There are scant data on recent trends in this neurological complication of opioid abuse. We hypothesized that increasing opioid abuse has led to a higher incidence of stroke associated with IE and opioid use. Methods- We used the 1993 to 2015 releases of the National Inpatient Sample and validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes ( ICD-9-CM) to identify hospitalizations with the combination of opioid abuse, IE, and stroke (defined as ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, or subarachnoid hemorrhage). Survey weights provided by the National Inpatient Sample were used to calculate nationally representative estimates and population estimates from the United States. Census data were used to calculate annual hospitalization rates per 10 million person-years. Joinpoint regression was used to assess trends. Results- From 1993 through 2015, there were 5283 hospitalizations with stroke associated with IE and opioid use. Across this period, the rate of such hospitalizations increased from 2.4 (95% CI, 0.5-4.3) to 18.8 (95% CI, 14.4-23.3) per 10 million US residents. Joinpoint regression detected 2 segments: no significant change in the hospitalization rate was apparent from 1993 to 2008 (annual percentage change, 1.9%; 95% CI, -2.2% to 6.1%), and then rates significantly increased from 2008 to 2015 (annual percentage change, 20.3%; 95% CI, 10.5%-30.9%), most dramatically in non-Hispanic white patients in the Northeastern and Southern United States. Conclusions- US hospitalization rates for stroke associated with IE and opioid use were stable for ≈2 decades but then sharply increased starting in 2008, coinciding with the emergence of the opioid epidemic.

Specialty Classifications of Physicians Who Provide Neurocritical Care in the United States.

BACKGROUND: We sought to characterize the specialty classification of US physicians who provide critical care for neurological/neurosurgical disease. METHODS: Using inpatient claims between 2009 and 2015 from a nationally representative 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we selected hospitalizations for neurological/neurosurgical diseases with potential to result in life-threatening manifestations requiring critical care. Using Current Procedural Terminology® codes, we determined the medical specialty of providers submitting critical care claims, and, using National Provider Identifier numbers, we merged in data from the United Council for Neurologic Subspecialties (UCNS) to determine whether the provider was a UCNS diplomate in neurocritical care. We defined providers with a clinical neuroscience background as neurologists, neurosurgeons, and/or UCNS diplomates in neurocritical care. We defined neurocritical care service as a critical care claim with a qualifying neurological/neurosurgical diagnosis in patients with a relevant primary hospital discharge diagnosis and ≥ 3 total critical care claims, excluding claims from the first day of hospitalization since these were mostly emergency-department claims. Our findings were reported using descriptive statistics with exact confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Among 1,952,305 Medicare beneficiaries, we identified 99,937 hospitalizations with at least one claim for neurocritical care. In our primary analysis, neurologists accounted for 28.0% (95% CI, 27.5-28.5%) of claims, neurosurgeons for 3.7% (95% CI, 3.5-3.9%), UCNS-certified neurointensivists for 25.8% (95% CI, 25.3-26.3%), and providers with any clinical neuroscience background for 42.8% (95% CI, 42.2-43.3%). The likelihood of management by physicians with a clinical neuroscience background increased proportionally with patients' county-level socioeconomic status and such providers were 3 times more likely to be based at an academic medical center than other physicians who billed for critical care in our sample (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-8.1). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians with a dedicated clinical neuroscience background accounted for less than half of neurocritical care service in US Medicare beneficiaries.

The Risk of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Acute Neurological Disease.

BACKGROUND: Case series have reported reversible left ventricular dysfunction, also known as stress cardiomyopathy or Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM), in the setting of acute neurological diseases such as subarachnoid hemorrhage. The relative associations between various neurological diseases and Takotsubo remain incompletely understood. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study of all adults in the National Inpatient Sample, a nationally representative sample of US hospitalizations, from 2006 to 2014. Our exposures of interest were primary diagnoses of acute neurological disease, defined by ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes. Our outcome was a diagnosis of TCM. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine the associations between our pre-specified neurological diagnoses and TCM after adjustment for demographics. RESULTS: Among acute neurological diagnoses, the strongest associations were seen with subarachnoid hemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 11.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2-13.4), status epilepticus (OR 4.9; 95% CI 3.7-6.3), and seizures (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5). In a sensitivity analysis including secondary diagnoses of acute neurological diagnoses, associations were also seen with transient global amnesia (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.5-3.6), meningoencephalitis (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.7-2.5), migraine (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.5-1.8), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.5), and ischemic stroke (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3). In addition, female sex was strongly associated with Takotsubo (OR 5.1; 95% CI 4.9-5.4). CONCLUSION: TCM appears to be associated with varying degrees with several acute neurological diseases besides subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Association Between Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Downstream Stroke.

Background and Purpose- Case reports suggest that unruptured intracranial aneurysms may serve as a nidus for thrombus formation and downstream embolic stroke. However, few data exist to support an association between unruptured aneurysms and ischemic stroke. Methods- We conducted a within-subjects case-control study of acute ischemic stroke patients prospectively enrolled in the Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry who had magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and arterial imaging of the head within 14 days of admission. Reviewers blinded to the study hypothesis ascertained the presence of aneurysms from the neuroradiologist's clinical report of the arterial imaging findings. McNemar test for paired data was used to compare the prevalence of unruptured aneurysms ipsilateral versus contralateral to the side of anterior circulation infarcts. Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery or in the posterior circulation were not counted in the analysis. Results- Among 2116 patients registered in the Cornell Acute Stroke Academic Registry during 2011 to 2016, 1541 met our inclusion criteria, of whom 176 (11.4%; 95% CI, 9.8-13.0%) had an intracranial aneurysm. The prevalence of aneurysms did not differ on the side ipsilateral versus contralateral to the infarction (risk ratio [RR], 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5). There was no significant association between aneurysms and ipsilateral stroke in secondary analyses of the 1244 patients with stroke in a single anterior circulation territory (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9), the 619 patients with cryptogenic stroke (RR, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.9-2.0), or the 485 patients with cryptogenic stroke in a single anterior circulation territory (RR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.8-3.3). Results were unchanged when counting only aneurysms >3 mm (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.9) or 5 mm in diameter (RR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9-1.5). Conclusions- Contrary to our hypothesis, we found no significant association between unruptured intracranial aneurysms and ipsilateral ischemic stroke.

Trends in Tracheostomy After Stroke: Analysis of the 1994 to 2013 National Inpatient Sample.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on long-term trends in the use of tracheostomy after stroke are limited. METHODS: Patients who underwent tracheostomy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were identified from the 1994 through 2013 releases of the National Inpatient Sample using previously validated International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Survey weights were used to report nationally representative estimates. Our primary outcome was the trend in tracheostomy use during the index stroke hospitalization over the last 20 years. Additionally, we evaluated trends in in-hospital mortality, timing of placement, and discharge disposition among patients who received a tracheostomy. RESULTS: We identified 9.9 million patients with AIS, ICH, or SAH in the United States from 1994 to 2013, of which 170 255 (1.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6%-1.8%) underwent tracheostomy. Among all patients with stroke, tracheostomy use increased from 1.2% (95% CI: 1.1%-1.4%) in 1994 to 1.9% (95% CI: 1.8%-2.1%) in 2013, with similar trends across stroke types. From 1994 to 2013, the timing of tracheostomy decreased from 16.5 days (95% CI: 14.9-18.1 days) to 10.3 days (95% CI: 9.9-10.8 days) after mechanical ventilation. In-hospital mortality decreased from 32.6% (95% CI: 29.1%-36.1%) to 13.8% (95% CI: 12.3%-15.3%) among tracheostomy patients; however, discharge to a nonacute care facility increased from 42.9% (95% CI: 38.0%-47.8%) to 83.3% (95% CI: 81.6%-85.0%) and home discharge declined from 9.3% (95% CI: 7.3%-11.3%) to 2.9% (95% CI: 2.1%-3.7%). CONCLUSION: Over the past 2 decades, tracheostomy use has increased among patients with stroke. This increase was associated with earlier placement, reduced in-hospital mortality, and lower rates of home discharge.